Saturday, March 2, 2024

COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — International Points

Creator and Web page info

  • by Anup Shah
  • This web page Created

On this web page:

  1. Introduction
  2. Assembly final result
  3. Mainstream media reporting
  4. In context: frequent however differentiated duties
  5. Extra info
  6. Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also referred to as the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to high

Assembly final result

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse gasoline emissions. Often called the Lima Accord, this treaty shouldn’t be legally binding and nations shouldn’t have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as an alternative agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it seemed like a profitable final result, others have been dissatisfied, akin to poor nations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and harm commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful elements of the assembly final result, noting

  1. The brand new settlement doesn’t replicate the urgency of the local weather disaster
  2. Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
  3. Least developed and susceptible nations overlooked within the chilly
  4. Divestment (from fossil gasoline reliance) is extra vital than ever
  5. International momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In making an attempt to place a constructive spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, In the long run, a world local weather treaty is only one device to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to return from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s nations comes collectively to debate this disaster and individuals are placing in huge efforts to ensure Paris [the next global meeting] gained’t be like Copenhagen which was filled with disappointments regardless of large guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s International Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly final result saying that political expediency gained over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to elucidate how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of probably the most susceptible nations, they fully eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and harm’.

Again to high

Mainstream media reporting

As with nearly each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this international challenge. The place the assembly was reported it was usually in direction of the top, and simply sound chew sort summaries saying all nations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a serious enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing frequent however differentiated duties the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has sometimes failed to offer rationalization and context of this precept that has been an vital a part of these talks for over 2 many years; that poor and creating nations mustn’t bear the identical duties because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier many years which have led to this, which is detailed far more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept could have been offered as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, reasonably then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from frequent reporting. Others included points on financing, expertise assist for poorer nations, and so on. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy nations have stalled on this stuff or actively prevented making an attempt to share expertise and so on, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is fabricated from mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations every year, it may be simple to return away with the impression that this assembly had a constructive final result.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! exhibits, there have been a lot of vital problems with rivalry:

Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to high

In context: frequent however differentiated duties

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from as we speak’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the primary greenhouse gasoline — stays within the ambiance for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling probably the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would subsequently be completely different for these teams of nations — the frequent however differentiated duties precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy nations are eager to eliminate .

The years of resistance on this challenge (and lots of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the dearth of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their huge greenhouse emissions lately, in comparison with the far higher quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has stated for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s ultimately — and disproportionately — paid for the by the creating nations. New Delhi based mostly Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Normal, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There is no such thing as a motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be completed by the developed nations. They [rich nations] mainly have simply stated at Lima that we’re not going to do any greater than what we’re doing to date, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different creating nations should share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in dangerous religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to high

Extra info

Because the convention remains to be underway as this web page is written, extra info shall be added right here after the occasion is over.

For extra in regards to the points from different organizations, listed below are some beginning factors:

Again to high

Information tales from IPS

Beneath is an inventory of tales from Inter Press Service associated to the Lima local weather convention and its aftermath.

  1. Peru’s Andean Peoples ‘Revive’ Water that the Local weather Disaster Is Taking From Them